> On 19 Apr 2015, at 21:47, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sunday 19 April 2015 13:17:20 Javier González wrote: >> >> Only providing user space support would defeat one of the main purposes >> of the driver. We could better organize the patches and divide them into user >> space support and in-kernel support if that is what you mean. In the end >> the interfaces are orthogonal, even though the functionality should be very >> similar. > > Splitting up the patches to separate the user interface from the in-kernel > interface is certainly a good idea, but aside from that, I also agree with > Greg on this point: if you want to establish an in-kernel interface, don't > add any dead code at the beginning, but add it together with the users > of that interface. > > Arnd Thanks for the feedback. We will do so. Javier.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail