On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:04:20AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:57:12AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > > +struct tee_device {
> > > + char name[TEE_MAX_DEV_NAME_LEN];
> > > + const struct tee_desc *desc;
> > > + struct device *dev;
> >
> > No, please embed the device in your structure, don't have a pointer to
> > it.
>
> Greg, "dev" here is not a locally allocated device, but the parent device.
> It's actually the same as struct tee_device.miscdev.parent, which could be
> used instead and this member deleted.
A miscdev doesn't need to have a "parent", it's just there to provide a
character device node to userspace, not to represent a "device that you
can do things with in the heirachy".
If you really want that, then use a real 'struct device' as should be
done here. Have just a pointer to a misc device, that is meant to be
dynamic.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
