On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 05:00:17PM +0530, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote: > Document the PCIe controller on IPQ5332 platform. > > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v5: Re-arrange 5332 and 9574 compatibles to handle fallback usage in dts What? How this is related to commit msg? > > v4: * v3 reused ipq9574 bindings for ipq5332. Instead add one for ipq5332 > * DTS uses ipq9574 compatible as fallback. Hence move ipq9574 to be able > to use the 'reg' section for both ipq5332 and ipq9574. Else, dtbs_check > and dt_binding_check flag errors. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > index bd87f6b49d68..9f37eca1ce0d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,pcie.yaml > @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ properties: > - qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074 > - qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3 > - - qcom,pcie-ipq9574 I don't understand this change at all and your commit msg explains here nothing. Best regards, Krzysztof
