> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: freescale: Add basic dtsi for imx943
>
> On 17/12/2024 09:55, Jacky Bai wrote:
> >>
> >>> + device_type = "cpu";
> >
> > ...
> >
> >>> + edma2: dma-controller@42000000 {
> >>> + compatible = "fsl,imx95-edma5";
> >>
> >> imx943 or imx95?
> >>
> >
> > Compatible with imx95, so I did not add new redundant dt binding entry.
> The entry is not redundant, because allows handling quirks or missing features
> (see writing bindings).
>
Thx for your time. For the edma node, I can understand we may need to add
imx943 specific compatible string, then fullback compatible imx95 string.
I do have one concern about other node like lpuart, i2c etc, Is it still necessary
to add new compatible string for new soc? Currently I reuse the compatibles
as imx95. I know previously we were asked to add new compatible string for
peripheral nodes when a new SoC is introduced, do we still need follow that
suggestion or some tradeoff?
lpuart1: serial@44380000 {
compatible = "fsl,imx95-lpuart", "fsl,imx8ulp-lpuart",
"fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart";
reg = <0x44380000 0x1000>;
BR
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
