RE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: freescale: Add basic dtsi for imx943

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: freescale: Add basic dtsi for imx943
> 
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:35:55PM +0800, Jacky Bai wrote:
> > The i.MX 943 applications processors integrate up to four Arm Cortex
> > A55 cores and supports functional safety with built-in 2x Arm Cortex
> > M33 and M7 cores which can be configured asa safety island. Optimizing
> > performance and power efficiency for Industrial, IoT and automotive
> > devices, i.MX 943 processors are built with NXP’s innovative Energy
> > Flex architecture.
> >
> > This patch adds the minimal dtsi support for i.MX943 with peripherals
> > like uart, edma, i2c, spi, mu, sai etc.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-clock.h  |  196 +++
> > .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-pinfunc.h | 1542
> +++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-power.h  |   41 +
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi     | 1284
> ++++++++++++++
> >  4 files changed, 3063 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-clock.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-pinfunc.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-power.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943.dtsi
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-clock.h
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-clock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..64b9d5d4051e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx943-clock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR MIT */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright 2024 NXP
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __CLOCK_IMX943_H
> > +#define __CLOCK_IMX943_H
> > +
> > +#define IMX943_CLK_EXT				0
> > +#define IMX943_CLK_OSC32K			1
> > +#define IMX943_CLK_OSC24M			2
> 
> 
> Why exactly are you adding clock indices to header files? Nothing in commit
> msg explains that.

These clock index macro defines will be used in dtsi or dts for clock reference.
I just follow the way that we have done for i.MX95. Anything need to be improved or refined?
For commit msg, I will add some explains in v2.

BR
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux