On Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 11:57:59AM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > Le 13/12/2024 à 21:46, Frank Li a écrit : > > From: Joy Zou <joy.zou-3arQi8VN3Tc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Support new PMIC PF9453, which is totally difference with PCA9450. So > > create new file for it. > > > > The PF9453 is a single chip Power Management IC (PMIC) specifically > > designed for i.MX 91 processor. It provides power supply solutions for IoT > > (Internet of Things), smart appliance, and portable applications where size > > and efficiency are critical. The device provides four high efficiency > > step-down regulators, three LDOs, one 400 mA load switch and 32.768 kHz > > crystal oscillator driver. > > ... > > > +/* PF9453_REG_BUCK2_CTRL bits */ > > +#define BUCK2_RAMP_MASK GENMASK(7, 4) > > This was 0xC0 in previous patch, so GENMASK(7, 6) if I'm correct. > Which one is the good one? > > (the datasheet I've found does not give any details, so I can't check) Good capture! It should be GENMASK(7, 6) Frank > > > +#define BUCK2_RAMP_25MV 0x0 > > +#define BUCK2_RAMP_12P5MV 0x1 > > +#define BUCK2_RAMP_6P25MV 0x2 > > +#define BUCK2_RAMP_3P125MV 0x3 > > ... > > > +/* PF9453_REG_LDO2_VOLT bits */ > > +#define LDO2_EN_MASK GENMASK(1, 0) > > +#define LDO2OUT_MASK GENMASK(6, 0) > > + > > +/* PF9453_REG_LDOSNVS_VOLT bits */ > > +#define LDOSNVS_EN_MASK 0x1 > > GENMASK(0, 0) to be consistent? > > > +#define LDOSNVSCFG1_MASK GENMASK(6, 0) > > + > > +/* PF9453_REG_IRQ bits */ > > +#define IRQ_RSVD 0x80 > > +#define IRQ_RSTB 0x40 > > +#define IRQ_ONKEY 0x20 > > +#define IRQ_RESETKEY 0x10 > > +#define IRQ_VR_FLT1 0x08 > > +#define IRQ_LOWVSYS 0x04 > > +#define IRQ_THERM_100 0x02 > > +#define IRQ_THERM_80 0x01 > > + > > +/* PF9453_REG_RESET_CTRL bits */ > > +#define WDOG_B_CFG_MASK GENMASK(7, 4) > > This was 0xC0 in previous patch, so GENMASK(7, 6) if I'm correct. > Which one is the good one? > > > +#define WDOG_B_CFG_NONE 0x00 > > +#define WDOG_B_CFG_WARM 0x40 > > +#define WDOG_B_CFG_COLD 0x80 > > ... > > CJ