Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] iio: accel: adxl345: rename variable data to st

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 18:31:57 +0100
Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2024 at 2:28 PM Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu,  5 Dec 2024 17:13:35 +0000
> > Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  
> > > Rename the locally used variable data to st. The st refers to "state",
> > > representing the internal state of the driver object. Further it
> > > prepares the usage of an internal data pointer needed for the
> > > implementation of the sensor features.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@xxxxxxxxx>  
> > Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git. Initially pushed out as testing
> > to let the bots take a look.  
> 
> Should I actually drop the "applied" patches in a v6? Or, may I keep them?

Rebase on top of my testing branch or just drop them. Either works.

> 
> I see that Dan Carpenters smatch now comes up with some issues. So, do
> the fixes go into v6 here, or better separate?
If for things I've picked up, then separate fixup at the beginning of
your v6.  I might squash them into original patches if I haven't pushed
out as togreg yet or they are particularly bad and I think worth potentially
work giving others a messy rebase.

Jonathan


> 
> Best,
> L






[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux