On Mon, Dec 09, 2024 at 08:30:07PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 09/12/2024 19:58, Wasim Nazir wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2024 at 01:49:51PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 06/12/2024 13:14, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-ride-r3.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-ride-r3.dts > >>>>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>>>> index 000000000000..a04c8d1fa258 > >>>>>> --- /dev/null > >>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs9075-ride-r3.dts > >>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > >>>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause > >>>>>> +/* > >>>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2024, Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved. > >>>>>> + */ > >>>>>> +/dts-v1/; > >>>>>> + > >>>>>> +#include "sa8775p-ride-r3.dts" > >>>>> No guys, you are making these things up. This is EXACTLY the same as > >>>>> qcs9100. > >>>> > >>>> 9100 & 9075 are different from “safe” perspective. They differ in > >>>> changes related to thermal which will be added later in devicetree. > >>> > >>> Since this can't be inferred from just looking at the changes, please > >>> make sure to add that to the commit message > >> > >> Any include of other DTS is clear sign something is odd here. Including > >> multiple times without any added nodes is showing these are not real > >> products/boards . > > > > We're adding DTS to reuse the common board changes, with plans to > > include the differences in upcoming patches. To provide more clarity, I > > will include patches in this series to highlight the differences between > > the 9100 and 9075 boards. > > Sure, still do not include DTS. Just like C files don't include C files. So, is the solution simple, rename .dts to .dtsi and include it from both .dts files? -- With best wishes Dmitry