On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 09:00:32AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > > +properties:
> > > > > + compatible:
> > > > > + enum:
> > > > > + - ethernet-phy-id2000.0181
> > > >
> > > > There's nothing specific here, can someone remind me why the generic
> > > > binding is not enough?
> > >
> > > The missing binding was blamed by checkpatch. Haw should I proceed with this
> > > patch?
> >
> > Does dtbs_check complain when you use it in a dts? What you have here
> > matches against the pattern ^ethernet-phy-id[a-f0-9]{4}\\.[a-f0-9]{4}$
> > so I think it won't. checkpatch might be too dumb to evaluate the regex?
>
> dtbs_check didn't complained about it, only checkpatch.
Checkpatch is not a reason to add bindings. Missing binding would be a
reason (e.g. pointed out by dtschema), but I understand this is not the
case here, so drop the patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
