On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 01:56:36PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Introduce devicetree binding for the Texas Instruments DP83TD510 > Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L Single Pair Ethernet PHY. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml | 35 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..cf13e86a4017 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/net/ti,dp83td510.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: TI DP83TD510 10BaseT1L PHY > + > +maintainers: > + - Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + > +description: > + DP83TD510E Ultra Low Power 802.3cg 10Base-T1L 10M Single Pair Ethernet PHY > + > +allOf: > + - $ref: ethernet-phy.yaml# > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - ethernet-phy-id2000.0181 There's nothing specific here, can someone remind me why the generic binding is not enough? > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + mdio { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + ethernet-phy@0 { > + compatible = "ethernet-phy-id2000.0181"; > + reg = <0>; > + }; > + }; > -- > 2.39.5 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
