On 20/11/2024 19:07, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 11/20/24 09:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 20/11/2024 18:11, Conor Dooley wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 11:58:25AM +0800, Cedric Encarnacion wrote: >>>> add dt-bindings for adp1051, adp1055, and ltp8800 pmbus. >>>> ADP1051: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Temperature >>>> ADP1055: 6 PWM for I/O Voltage, I/O Current, Power, Temperature >>>> LTP8800-1A/-2/-4A: 150A/135A/200A DC/DC µModule Regulator >>>> >>>> Co-developed-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Czezar Torreno <alexisczezar.torreno@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Cedric Encarnacion <cedricjustine.encarnacion@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Why did you drop my ack? >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241106-linoleum-kebab-decf14f54f76@spud/ >> So that's a v2? Or v3? Then should be marked correctly. Please start >> using b4. I already asked analog.com for this in few cases. Feel free >> not to use b4 if you send correct patches, but this is not the case here. >> > > In general I agree, but this is a combination of two patch series, as mentioned > in the summary. I am not sure how to use versioning in such situations. Is it > v2 of one series or v3 of the other ? I would say the highest and keep the b4 changeset. This allows to use b4 diff easily. Choice done here - v1, no usage of b4 - breaks everything, look: b4 diff '<20241120035826.3920-1-cedricjustine.encarnacion@xxxxxxxxxx>' Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20241120035826.3920-1-cedricjustine.encarnacion@xxxxxxxxxx/t.mbox.gz --- Analyzing 13 messages in the thread Could not find lower series to compare against. Best regards, Krzysztof
