Hi Stephen,
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 12:21 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Quoting Rob Herring (2024-10-17 13:38:10)
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 02:20:15PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Some configurations want to enable CONFIG_KUNIT without enabling
> > > CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY. The kunit overlay code already skips if
> > > CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY isn't enabled, so this select here isn't really doing
> > > anything besides making it easier to run the tests without them
> > > skipping. Remove the select and move the config setting to the
> > > drivers/of/.kunitconfig file so that the overlay tests can be run with
> > > or without CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY set to test either behavior.
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 027af8c26fdc0642 ("of: Allow
overlay kunit tests to run CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY=n") in dt-rh/for-next.
> > > Fixes: 5c9dd72d8385 ("of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs")
> >
> > Doesn't really seem like a fix.
>
> Ok. Feel free to drop the tag.
>
> > Does this need to go into 6.12?
>
> It's only important for 6.12 if kernel configurators want to build the
> kernel with OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST enabled and not be forced to enable
> CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY. I don't mind if it waits a while.
I'd say it's a fix, so please keep at last the Fixes tag. Merely
enabling kunit tests (which can be modular) should not increase the
possible attack vector on a product by enabling extra unneeded code.
So
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
