On 07/11/2024 12:06, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:23:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 05/11/2024 19:04, Raj Kumar Bhagat wrote: >>> The RDP433 is a Qualcomm Reference Design Platform based on the >>> IPQ9574. It features three QCN9274 WiFi devices connected to PCIe1, >>> PCIe2, and PCIe3. These devices are also interconnected via a WLAN >>> Serial Interface (WSI) connection. This WSI connection is essential >>> for exchanging control information among these devices. >>> >>> This patch series describes the WSI interface found in QCN9274 in >>> device tree and uses this device tree node in the Ath12k driver to get the >>> details of WSI connection for Multi Link Operation (MLO) among multiple >>> QCN9274 devices. >>> >>> NOTES: >>> 1. As ath12k MLO patches are not ready yet, this patchset does not apply >>> to the ath.git ath-next branch and that's why the patchset is marked >>> as RFC. These are the work-in-progress patches we have at the moment. >>> The full set of MLO patches is available at: >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ath/ath.git/log/?h=ath12k-mlo-qcn9274 >>> >>> 2. The dependency marked below applies only to the DTS patch. The >>> dt-bindings patches do not have this dependency. >>> >>> Depends-On: [PATCH V7 0/4] Add PCIe support for IPQ9574 >>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20240801054803.3015572-1-quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx/ >>> >>> v3: >>> - Created a separate binding "qcom,ath12k-wsi.yaml" to describe ath12k PCI >>> devices with WSI interface. >> >> Thanks for the changes. When you finish with testing/RFC, please send >> proper version for review (just remember to keep numbering, next one is >> v4 regardless whether this is RFC or not). > > Isn't the 'RFC' being an invitation for review per the nature of the tag > itself? No, RFC means patch is not ready, might change. This was brought on the lists multiple times and some maintainers clearly ignore RFC. Including me. > Best regards, Krzysztof
