On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 10:18:10AM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
> On 05/11/2024 18:03, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 03:58:14PM +0000, Matt Coster wrote:
> >> + / {
> >> + #address-cells = <2>;
> >> + #size-cells = <2>;
> >> + interrupt-controller;
> >> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> >> +
> >> + gpu@4e20000000 {
> >> + compatible = "ti,j721s2-gpu", "img,img-bxs-4-64", "img,img-rogue";
> >> + reg = /bits/ 64 <0x4e2000 0000 0x80000>;
> >
> > Can you format this normally please? Drop the #address/size-cells down
> > to 1 if you're against having 0x0s.
>
> Sure. I thought /bits/ was the "new" way of doing things, but I'm not
> really bothered either way.
Maybe in other cases, I've never seen it for reg. The dts coding style
examples even have 0x0s in them. For other properties, sure this might
be the "new" way of doing it but not for reg, probably in part because
it makes it difficult to see if the number matches the number of cells
in #address/size-cells.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
