On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 11:40:18AM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote: > The QCOM SCMI vendor protocol provides a generic way of exposing a > number of Qualcomm SoC specific features (like memory bus scaling) > through a mixture of pre-determined algorithm strings and param_id > pairs hosted on the SCMI controller. Introduce a client driver that > uses the memlat algorithm string hosted on QCOM SCMI Vendor Protocol > to detect memory latency workloads and control frequency/level of > the various memory buses (DDR/LLCC/DDR_QOS). > > QCOM SCMI Generic Vendor protocol background: > It was found that a lot of the vendor protocol used internally was > for debug/internal development purposes that would either be super > SoC specific or had to be disabled because of some features being > fused out during production. This lead to a large number of vendor > protocol numbers being quickly consumed and were never released > either. Using a generic vendor protocol with functionality abstracted > behind algorithm strings gave us the flexibility of allowing such > functionality exist during initial development/debugging while > still being able to expose functionality like memlat once they have > matured enough. The param-ids are certainly expected to act as ABI > for algorithms strings like MEMLAT. I wanted to give this series a quick spin on the x1e80100 CRD, but ran into some issues. First, I expected the drivers to be loaded automatically when built as modules, but that did not happen so something appears to be missing. Second, after loading the protocol and client drivers manually (in that order, shouldn't the client driver pull in the protocol?), I got: scmi_module: Loaded SCMI Vendor Protocol 0x80 - Qualcomm 20000 arm-scmi arm-scmi.0.auto: QCOM Generic Vendor Version 1.0 scmi-qcom-generic-ext-memlat scmi_dev.5: error -EOPNOTSUPP: failed to configure common events scmi-qcom-generic-ext-memlat scmi_dev.5: probe with driver scmi-qcom-generic-ext-memlat failed with error -95 which seems to suggest that the firmware on my CRD does not support this feature. Is that the way this should be interpreted? And does that mean that non of the commercial laptops supports this either? Johan
