On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 10:36 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 12:56:16PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 at 12:05, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The merge strategy seems reasonable to me. But I am fine with that > > > whatever works for Mark. > > > Mark, any update on this? > > > If easier, you could also just ack the regulator patch (patch1), and > > can just take it all via my tree. > > I'm still deciding what I think about the regulator patch, I can see why > it's wanted in this situation but it's also an invitation to misuse by > drivers just blindly requesting all supplies and not caring if things > work. I suppose an alternative is to flag which power domains actually need a regulator supply. The MediaTek power domain driver does this. There's still the issue of backwards compatibility with older device trees that are missing said supply though. ChenYu
