在2024年10月29日十月 下午4:11，Jiaxun Yang写道： > 在2024年10月29日十月 下午12:21，Aleksandar Rikalo写道： > [...] >> >>> Is this property applicable for all MIPS vendors? There is no vendor >>> prefix here, so this is generic for this architecture, right? > > I'd say the best vendor prefix is mti in this case. > > CM3 IP block is supplied by MIPS Technology, it is not a part of MIPS > architecture spec. I just tried to revise this problem and I think a better approach would be picking my CM binding [1] patch and add this as a property to CM binding. You don't need to pick rest of that series, this binding alone is sufficient, and it's already being reviewed. Thanks [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240612-cm_probe-v2-5-a5b55440563c@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Thanks > -- > - Jiaxun -- - Jiaxun
