Hi,
On Thursday 26 March 2015 05:36 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
On 15-03-25 05:01 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2015 04:12 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Hi Kishon,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:58:50AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 21 March 2015 02:55 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:
+struct bcm_phy_driver {
+ void __iomem *usbphy_regs;
+ void __iomem *usb2h_idm_regs;
+ void __iomem *usb2d_idm_regs;
+ struct bcm_phy_instance *ports[MAX_PHY_PORTS];
er.. can't we allocate this dynamically?
The chip has support for only 3 phys, so I believe allocating array of 3
pointers is simplest.
[...]
+
+static struct phy *bcm_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev,
+ struct of_phandle_args *args)
+{
+ struct bcm_phy_driver *phy_driver = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ struct bcm_phy_instance *port = NULL;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!phy_driver)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(args->args_count != 1))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ if (WARN_ON(args->args[0] < 0 || args->args[0] > 1))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phy_driver->ports); i++) {
+ struct bcm_phy_instance *p = phy_driver->ports[i];
+
+ if (p && p->generic_phy->dev.of_node == args->np) {
+ port = p;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (!port) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to locate phy %s\n", args->np->name);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ }
+
+ port->host_mode = args->args[0];
+
+ return port->generic_phy;
+}
The xlate function here shouldn't be needed at all. Use of_phy_simple_xlate
instead.
of_phy_simple_xlate() will not allow specifying host vs device mode when
requesting phy though...
indeed!
Kishon, to confirm , are the xlate function and the MAX_PHY_PORTS ok or are you
recommending changes? Thanks
as Dmitry pointed out you'll still need your own implementation of xlate.
Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
