On Thursday 26 March 2015 04:12 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Hi Kishon, > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:58:50AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Saturday 21 March 2015 02:55 AM, Arun Ramamurthy wrote: >>> +struct bcm_phy_driver { >>> + void __iomem *usbphy_regs; >>> + void __iomem *usb2h_idm_regs; >>> + void __iomem *usb2d_idm_regs; >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *ports[MAX_PHY_PORTS]; >> >> er.. can't we allocate this dynamically? > > The chip has support for only 3 phys, so I believe allocating array of 3 > pointers is simplest. > > [...] > >>> + >>> +static struct phy *bcm_usb_phy_xlate(struct device *dev, >>> + struct of_phandle_args *args) >>> +{ >>> + struct bcm_phy_driver *phy_driver = dev_get_drvdata(dev); >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *port = NULL; >>> + int i; >>> + >>> + if (!phy_driver) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + if (WARN_ON(args->args_count != 1)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + if (WARN_ON(args->args[0] < 0 || args->args[0] > 1)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(phy_driver->ports); i++) { >>> + struct bcm_phy_instance *p = phy_driver->ports[i]; >>> + >>> + if (p && p->generic_phy->dev.of_node == args->np) { >>> + port = p; >>> + break; >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + if (!port) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to locate phy %s\n", args->np->name); >>> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); >>> + } >>> + >>> + port->host_mode = args->args[0]; >>> + >>> + return port->generic_phy; >>> +} >> >> The xlate function here shouldn't be needed at all. Use of_phy_simple_xlate >> instead. > > of_phy_simple_xlate() will not allow specifying host vs device mode when > requesting phy though... indeed! -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html