On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 11:29:03AM -0400, Frank Li wrote:
> > You can't keep Reviewed-by tags when you change a patch considerably: Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
>
> Sorry, I omitted it since it is nxp internal reviewer. Do I need repost
> it?
No, I can zap it.
> > > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > What does that SOB tag mean?
>
> It is original nxp layerscape platform maintainer. He leave NXP recently
> and some item in MAINTANERS already been removed. It intents to fix
> layerscape platform problem at beginning. And orginal patch have his SOB.
> So I kept as original one.
Ok.
You forgot to comment on this part:
> > >= 0 implies != -1, right?
> >
> > IOW?
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> > index 846a4ba25342..fe822cb9b562 100644
> > --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> > +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c
> > @@ -328,24 +328,21 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> > * TODO: Add support for 32-bit wide buses
> > */
> > if ((err_detect & DDR_EDE_SBE) && (bus_width == 64)) {
> > - u64 cap = (u64)cap_high << 32 | (u64)cap_low;
> > + u64 cap = (u64)cap_high << 32 | cap_low;
> > u32 s = syndrome;
> >
> > sbe_ecc_decode(cap_high, cap_low, syndrome,
> > &bad_data_bit, &bad_ecc_bit);
> >
> > - if (bad_data_bit != -1)
> > - fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> > - "Faulty Data bit: %d\n", bad_data_bit);
> > - if (bad_ecc_bit != -1)
> > - fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> > - "Faulty ECC bit: %d\n", bad_ecc_bit);
> > -
> > - if (bad_data_bit >= 0)
> > + if (bad_data_bit >= 0) {
> > + fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR, "Faulty Data bit: %d\n", bad_data_bit);
> > cap ^= 1ULL << bad_data_bit;
> > + }
> >
> > - if (bad_ecc_bit >= 0)
> > + if (bad_ecc_bit >= 0) {
> > + fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR, "Faulty ECC bit: %d\n", bad_ecc_bit);
> > s ^= 1 << bad_ecc_bit;
> > + }
> >
> > fsl_mc_printk(mci, KERN_ERR,
> > "Expected Data / ECC:\t%#8.8x_%08x / %#2.2x\n",
> >
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
