Hello Daniel, On Mon, 21 Oct 2024 15:58:42 +0200 Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Lan969x will require a few additional registers for certain operations. > Some are shared, some are not. Add these. > > Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [...] > +#define PTP_PTP_TWOSTEP_STAMP_SUBNS_STAMP_SUB_NSEC GENMASK(7, 0) I understand that this is partly autogenerated, however the naming for this register in particular seems very redundant... Is there any way this could be improved ? Thanks, Maxime
