On 10/18/2024 3:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 05:01:48PM +0800, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
On 10/18/2024 4:06 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2024 at 10:48, Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/18/2024 2:27 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 at 16:07, Krishna Kurapati
<quic_kriskura@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Provide PHY configuration for the USB QMP PHY for QCS615 Platform.
Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
After checking platform details,
Unreviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Please perform global s/QCS615/SM6150/ and s/qcs615/sm6150/
QCS615 and SM6150 are different variants of the same SoC. QCS615 is an
IoT variant, while SM6150 is a mobile variant. We are currently adding
QCS615 SoC support to the upstream Kernel, as it is in an active
development stage and we anticipate many products based on this SoC. On
the other hand, the SM6150 is an older mobile platform that is unlikely
to be used in new designs. For a product introduction of the QCS615,
please refer to
https://docs.qualcomm.com/bundle/publicresource/87-83838-1_REV_A_Qualcomm_IQ6_Series_Product_Brief.pdf
Yes, I guessed so. It would have been nice if it was documented this
way from the beginning.
Please note that we usually get support for the mobile SoC first. So
in most of the cases devices use mobile compatible even for IoT
platforms, see qrb5165, qrb4210, qcm6490 and other similar platforms.
I simply asked to follow the established pattern.
Yes, we start from mobile variant for most of the platforms. There are some
exceptions like sc7180 and sc7280 which we started from compute variant
since they are widely used by compute platform on upstream Kernel. I think
we have similar case here. QCS615 will be widely used by IOT products on
upstream Kernel. We should have clarified this from beginning so there's no
ambiguity.
After offline discussion with Krzysztof, I'll lift my objection, so
still Reviewed-by.
Thanks Dmitry.
Can you help review patch-4 of the series. I made the changes you
suggested on v1 (uppercase to lowercase and removing un-necessary re-inits).
Regards,
Krishna,
