Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: Add device-name in the coresight components

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/10/2024 12:17, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 24/07/2024 20:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 03/07/2024 14:23, Mao Jinlong wrote:
>>> Current name of coresight component's folder consists of prefix of
>>> the device and the id in the device list. When run 'ls' command,
>>> we can get the register address of the device. Take CTI for example,
>>> if we want to set the config for modem CTI, but we can't know which
>>> CTI is modem CTI from all current information.
>>>
>>> cti_sys0 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/138f0000.cti/cti_sys0
>>> cti_sys1 -> ../../../devices/platform/soc@0/13900000.cti/cti_sys1
>>>
>>> Add device-name in device tree which can provide a better description
>>> of the coresight device. It can provide the info like the system or
>>> HW it belongs to.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml          | 6 ++++++
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-dummy-source.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-stm.yaml          | 6 ++++++
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom,coresight-tpdm.yaml        | 6 ++++++
>>>   4 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
>>> index 2d5545a2b49c..6a73eaa66a42 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,coresight-cti.yaml
>>> @@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ properties:
>>>     power-domains:
>>>       maxItems: 1
>>>   
>>> +  arm,cs-dev-name:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
>>> +    description:
>>> +      Define the name which can describe what kind of HW or system the
>>> +      coresight device belongs to.
>>
>> Don't we use already label for such cases? Power domains, input, leds,
>> panels, IIO, hwmon and more.
> 
> We do and if we can get hold of them, that would be ideal. but do we get 
> them in the binary DT blob ?  At least I couldn't see them on my Juno
> dtb.

I meant "label" property (a string). See above bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux