Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add device tree for Ampere's Mt. Jefferson BMC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 17/10/2024 07:08, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.]


Hi Chanh,

On Wed, 2024-10-16 at 17:26 +0700, Chanh Nguyen wrote:

On 16/10/2024 12:07, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
You can also find discussions where other maintainers (Guenter, hwmon
maintainer; Krzysztof, devicetree maintainer) have asked that "pmbus"
not be used as a compatible:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/f76798ea-6edd-4888-8057-c09aaed88f25@xxxxxxxxxxxx/


Hi Andrew,
I checked the discussion at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/f76798ea-6edd-4888-8057-c09aaed88f25@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
. It seems the maintainers don't want to use the "pmbus" compatible for
specific devices. The maintaners require an explicitly compatible from
device list in drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c .


There are two problems:

1. Describing your _hardware_ (not drivers) in the devicetree
2. Binding a driver to your device

You ultimately care about both 1 and 2 as you want Linux to do
something useful with the device, but for the purpose of this patch
adding the devicetree, 1 is what matters and 2 is not really a part of
the considerations.

What needs to be the case is that the devicetree describes the device
via an appropriate compatible string for the device (manufacturer and
part number). Prior to that, the compatible string for the device needs
to be documented in a devicetree binding. This may be the trivial-
devices binding if there are no extra properties that need to be
described, or you may need to write your own binding document for the
device if it's more complex and one doesn't yet exist.

So whatever is in pmbus.c needs to be fixed later on if your device is
not yet supported by it, but that's a separate problem (2) to the
problem you have here (1).

Who is the manufacturer and what is the part number?


Andrew

Thank Andrew for your explanation! I'm so happy to receive comments from you.

I'll remove the PSU node with "pmbus" compatible in the patch v2. We'll discuss more to have a suitable PSU node later.

I'm preparing the patch v2. Summary, I need to update as the below list.
1. Add Mt. Jefferson board compatible binding as Krzysztof pointed.
2. Remove the PSU node with "pmbus" compatible.

If you have any other comments on patch v1 please don't hesitate to point out; I'll update that in patch v2.

Regards,
Chanh




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux