On 16/10/2024 12:07, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 13:39 +0700, Chanh Nguyen wrote:On 15/10/2024 07:44, Andrew Jeffery wrote:Hi Chanh, On Mon, 2024-10-14 at 09:05 -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 10:50:31 +0000, Chanh Nguyen wrote:The Mt. Jefferson BMC is an ASPEED AST2600-based BMC for the Mt. Jefferson hardware reference platform with AmpereOne(TM)M processor. Signed-off-by: Chanh Nguyen <chanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile | 1 + .../aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dts | 646 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 647 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dtsMy bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this series. Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform maintainer has comments. If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dtb' for 20241014105031.1963079-1-chanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dtb: /: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: 'ampere,mtjefferson-bmc' is not one of ['delta,ahe50dc-bmc', 'facebook,galaxy100-bmc', 'facebook,wedge100-bmc', 'facebook,wedge40-bmc', 'microsoft,olympus-bmc', 'quanta,q71l-bmc', 'tyan,palmetto-bmc', 'yadro,vesnin-bmc'] 'ampere,mtjefferson-bmc' is not one of ['amd,daytonax-bmc', 'amd,ethanolx-bmc', 'ampere,mtjade-bmc', 'aspeed,ast2500-evb', 'asrock,e3c246d4i-bmc', 'asrock,e3c256d4i-bmc', 'asrock,romed8hm3-bmc', 'asrock,spc621d8hm3-bmc', 'asrock,x570d4u-bmc', 'bytedance,g220a-bmc', 'facebook,cmm-bmc', 'facebook,minipack-bmc', 'facebook,tiogapass-bmc', 'facebook,yamp-bmc', 'facebook,yosemitev2-bmc', 'facebook,wedge400-bmc', 'hxt,stardragon4800-rep2-bmc', 'ibm,mihawk-bmc', 'ibm,mowgli-bmc', 'ibm,romulus-bmc', 'ibm,swift-bmc', 'ibm,witherspoon-bmc', 'ingrasys,zaius-bmc', 'inspur,fp5280g2-bmc', 'inspur,nf5280m6-bmc', 'inspur,on5263m5-bmc', 'intel,s2600wf-bmc', 'inventec,lanyang-bmc', 'lenovo,hr630-bmc', 'lenovo,hr855xg2-bmc', 'portwell,neptune-bmc', 'qcom,centriq2400-rep-bmc', 'supermicro,x11spi-bmc', 'tyan,s7106-bmc', 'tyan,s8036-bmc', 'yadro,nicole-bmc', 'yadro,vegman-n110-bmc', 'yadro,vegman-rx20-bmc', 'yadro,vegman-sx20-bmc'] 'ampere,mtjefferson-bmc' is not one of ['ampere,mtmitchell-bmc', 'aspeed,ast2600-evb', 'aspeed,ast2600-evb-a1', 'asus,x4tf-bmc', 'facebook,bletchley-bmc', 'facebook,catalina-bmc', 'facebook,cloudripper-bmc', 'facebook,elbert-bmc', 'facebook,fuji-bmc', 'facebook,greatlakes-bmc', 'facebook,harma-bmc', 'facebook,minerva-cmc', 'facebook,yosemite4-bmc', 'ibm,blueridge-bmc', 'ibm,everest-bmc', 'ibm,fuji-bmc', 'ibm,rainier-bmc', 'ibm,system1-bmc', 'ibm,tacoma-bmc', 'inventec,starscream-bmc', 'inventec,transformer-bmc', 'jabil,rbp-bmc', 'qcom,dc-scm-v1-bmc', 'quanta,s6q-bmc', 'ufispace,ncplite-bmc'] 'aspeed,ast2400' was expected 'aspeed,ast2500' was expected from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/aspeed/aspeed.yaml#This needs to be fixed as pointed out by Krzysztof.Thank Andrew, I'll update that in patch v2*snip*arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dtb: /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c@180/i2c-mux@70/i2c@0/psu@58: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['pmbus'] arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ampere-mtjefferson.dtb: /ahb/apb/bus@1e78a000/i2c@180/i2c-mux@70/i2c@0/psu@59: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['pmbus']These two should also be fixed. The compatible must describe the physical device, not the communication/application protocol. It may be necessary to add a binding if there's not one already for the device.Hi Andrew, My device is following the pmbus specification. So I'm using the generic pmbus driver (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c#n237) to probe my device.The devicetree doesn't describe drivers though, it describes devices. The compatible string needs to represent the device.In arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ directory, many boards are also using this compatible to probe our devices. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-lenovo-hr855xg2.dts#n219 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-inventec-transformers.dts#n263 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-tyan-s8036.dts#n260 Andrew, Recently I saw the ASPEED platform's maintainer accept the "pmbus" compatible with a warning log. You can see in the below list that patches were merged recently. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=bb3776e564d2190db0ef45609e66f13c60ce5b48 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=28cfb03afcb20a841e96e821ba20870a7c437034 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=36d96827f480e90037d162098061333e279ea35fUnfortunately for your argument, I'm not trying to make the case that some people are allowed to do this and others (such as yourself) are not. Rather, this is the review process in action, where hopefully everyone, including myself, tries to improve their practices with feedback.
Thank Andrew for your feedback!
You can also find discussions where other maintainers (Guenter, hwmon maintainer; Krzysztof, devicetree maintainer) have asked that "pmbus" not be used as a compatible: https://lore.kernel.org/all/f76798ea-6edd-4888-8057-c09aaed88f25@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
Hi Andrew,I checked the discussion at https://lore.kernel.org/all/f76798ea-6edd-4888-8057-c09aaed88f25@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ . It seems the maintainers don't want to use the "pmbus" compatible for specific devices. The maintaners require an explicitly compatible from device list in drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c . Please correct me if I'm wrong anything!
This is device list from drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c {"adp4000", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"bmr310", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_status}, {"bmr453", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"bmr454", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"bmr456", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"bmr457", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"bmr458", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_status}, {"bmr480", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_status}, {"bmr490", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_status}, {"bmr491", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_status}, {"bmr492", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"dps460", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_skip}, {"dps650ab", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_skip}, {"dps800", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_skip}, {"max20796", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"mdt040", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"ncp4200", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"ncp4208", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"pdt003", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"pdt006", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"pdt012", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"pmbus", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_zero}, {"sgd009", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one_skip}, {"tps40400", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"tps544b20", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"tps544b25", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"tps544c20", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"tps544c25", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one}, {"udt020", (kernel_ulong_t)&pmbus_info_one},My device is similar with the "pmbus" compatible about the "pmbus_info_zero" attribute. So I chose the "pmbus" compatible string for my device. If the maintainers require an explicitly compatible from device list in drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c but not "pmbus", then I must add my device compatible string to the list in drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.c . Please help me confirm my understanding.
Thanks, Chanh
The tools are asking you to do something different via the warnings, and so am I :) Please define the compatible according to the device used in the design. Thanks, Andrew