On 10/9/24 14:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 12:04:46PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
The description for assigned-clock-parents looks redundant, It doesn't
contain anything new apart from rephrasing the straightforward meaning
of assigned-clock-parents, and furthermore there is a typo in the
description, hence let me drop the description here.
Fixes: 25bafac9408f ("dt-bindings: soc: ti: Update TI PRUSS bindings regarding clock-muxes")
Nothing to fix here, no need to backport. We really do not need to
backport corrections of minor typos in comments. They do not bring any
value, just work. I am surprised that you proposed to backport it as
Canonical employee... ask anyone in Canonical kernel team if they want
to deal with backporting this.
Yes, you are right, it is not worth backporting such a fix. I will send
v3 and drop the tag of Fixes.
Thanks,
Hui.
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
