On Wed, Oct 09, 2024 at 12:04:46PM +0800, Hui Wang wrote:
> The description for assigned-clock-parents looks redundant, It doesn't
> contain anything new apart from rephrasing the straightforward meaning
> of assigned-clock-parents, and furthermore there is a typo in the
> description, hence let me drop the description here.
>
> Fixes: 25bafac9408f ("dt-bindings: soc: ti: Update TI PRUSS bindings regarding clock-muxes")
Nothing to fix here, no need to backport. We really do not need to
backport corrections of minor typos in comments. They do not bring any
value, just work. I am surprised that you proposed to backport it as
Canonical employee... ask anyone in Canonical kernel team if they want
to deal with backporting this.
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
