On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 10:07:46AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: [...] > > There is no recovery without the patch, we are not giving up the arm_scmi > > platform device because there is no mechanism to return -ENODEV and allow > > any of the subsequent transport drivers enabled to attempt to take over the > > platform device and probe it again. > > > > Ok...so it is a workaround hack indeed....but it seems NOT to have bad > side effects and there is definitely no cleaner way to make it bind > properly...beside fixing your DTs for the future... As I mentioned earlier, I am not against the change as it doesn't have any other side-effects and just accidentally fixes the issue you have. But it does sound like a hacky solution to your problem. What if some other legit reason(theoretically) it needs to be reversed again in the future. So I am still interested to see if we can fix it without this. -- Regards, Sudeep
