On 07/10/2024 09:30, sunyeal.hong wrote: > Hello Krzyszto, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 4:20 PM >> To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sylwester Nawrocki >> <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alim >> Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Turquette >> <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring >> <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC >> >> On 07/10/2024 09:18, Sunyeal Hong wrote: >>> This patchset adds the CMU block below to support exynosauto v920 SoC. >>> - CMU_PERIC1 >>> - CMU_MISC >>> - CMU_HSI0/1 >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - Rebase the patch to reflect the latest fixes >> >> Not much improved. Still blind rebase without addressing the issue I >> pointed out. >> >> Allow people to actually review your patches, instead of sending multiple >> versions within 5 minutes. >> >> One patchset per 24h. >> > I apologize for sending you the patch version incorrectly multiple times. > Could you elaborate a bit more on the "unrelated change" part you mentioned in the comment? > I don't think I understand your exact intention. I do not see above "unrelated change" quote. Please respond inline. Best regards, Krzysztof
