Hello Krzyszto, > -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, October 7, 2024 4:20 PM > To: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sylwester Nawrocki > <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Alim > Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Turquette > <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring > <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] add clocks support for exynosauto v920 SoC > > On 07/10/2024 09:18, Sunyeal Hong wrote: > > This patchset adds the CMU block below to support exynosauto v920 SoC. > > - CMU_PERIC1 > > - CMU_MISC > > - CMU_HSI0/1 > > > > Changes in v2: > > - Rebase the patch to reflect the latest fixes > > Not much improved. Still blind rebase without addressing the issue I > pointed out. > > Allow people to actually review your patches, instead of sending multiple > versions within 5 minutes. > > One patchset per 24h. > I apologize for sending you the patch version incorrectly multiple times. Could you elaborate a bit more on the "unrelated change" part you mentioned in the comment? I don't think I understand your exact intention. Best Regards, sunyeal > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
