On 04/10/2024 11:31, Taniya Das wrote: > > > On 9/13/2024 10:35 AM, Taniya Das wrote: >> >> >> On 9/6/2024 5:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 18/08/2024 20:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:01:47PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote: >>>>> Add device tree bindings for the display clock controllers >>>>> on Qualcomm SA8775P platform. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>> --- >>>>> .../bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.yaml | 79 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sa8775p-dispcc.h | 87 >>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>> 2 files changed, 166 insertions(+) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Un-reviewed. >>> >>> We achieved consensus allowing sa8775p to stay, but now Qualcomm changes >>> point of view and insists on new approach of dropping sa8775p. Therefore >>> this change does not make much sense in the new approach. >>> >> >> Krzysztof could you please re-review the patches again? As I understand >> that Qualcomm will support both SA8775p and QCS9100 in Kernel. There’s >> no plan to drop SA8775p support. These two SoCs will keep compatible. >> > Krzysztof, Could you please help reviewing the patches again? They are not in the patchwork anymore, not in my inbox, so I cannot review them. Please resend. That's generic rule - don't ping needlessly multiple times, but resend. Best regards, Krzysztof
