On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 09:42:32AM +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 02/10/24 08:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 10:21:35AM +0800, Pablo Sun wrote: > > > mt8188 has the same GPU speed binning efuse field just > > > like mt8186, which requires post-processing to convert to the > > > bit field format specified by OPP table. > > > > > > Add the binding for the compatible list: > > > "mediatek,mt8188-efuse", "mediatek,mt8186-efuse" > > > so mt8188 uses the same conversion. > > > > > > Suggested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Sun <pablo.sun@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml | 4 ++++ > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml > > > index 32b8c1eb4e80..70815a3329bf 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/mediatek,efuse.yaml > > > @@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ properties: > > > - mediatek,mt8195-efuse > > > - mediatek,mt8516-efuse > > > - const: mediatek,efuse > > > + - items: > > > + - enum: > > > + - mediatek,mt8188-efuse > > > + - const: mediatek,mt8186-efuse > > > > And this is not compatible with generic one? This is confusing. Why are > > you adding generic fallbacks if they are not valid? > > > > It was my suggestion to start dropping the usage of the generic "mediatek,efuse" > fallback, as I've seen multiple times feedback saying to not use generic fallbacks. > > Was that wrong? No, just nothing provided the background that such change is intentional. Please mention in commit msg that the preferred way from now on is not using the generic fallback. Maybe even add it to the binding itself as comment, so people won't grow the enum with fallback. Best regards, Krzysztof
