On 10/1/24 3:26 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 4:05 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> <aardelean@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
...
>> @@ -153,7 +349,19 @@ static int ad7606_scan_direct(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int ch,
>> if (ret)
>> goto error_ret;
>>
>> - *val = sign_extend32(st->data[ch], 15);
>> + chan = &indio_dev->channels[ch + 1];
>> + if (chan->scan_type.sign == 'u') {
>> + if (storagebits > 16)
>> + *val = st->data.buf32[ch];
>> + else
>> + *val = st->data.buf16[ch];
>> + return 0;
>
> Arrggh...
> I messed up here.
> Guillaume found a bug here, where this should be "goto error_ret" or
> do an "if () {} else {}"
> How should we do it here?
>
> Do we send a fix-patch or send a new series?
>
Since this patch is already applied, just follow up with another
patch with a Fixes: tag.
