On Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 09:56:30AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On October 1, 2024 5:42:35 AM GMT+03:00, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 10:55:05AM GMT, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2024 at 01:03:37PM GMT, Sibi Sankar wrote: > >[..] > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/x1e001de-devkit.dts > >[..] > >> > + > >> > +&pcie5 { > >> > + perst-gpios = <&tlmm 149 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > >> > + wake-gpios = <&tlmm 151 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > >> > + > >> > + vddpe-3v3-supply = <&vreg_wwan>; > >> > >> Please use pwrseq instead. > >> > > > >What benefit is there to wrap a single 3.3V regulator in pwrseq driver? > > First of all, is it really just a 3.3V? Second, is it actually powering up the host controller (as expressed in the device tree? Is it a power supply to the slot (in this case, I think, it should be expressed differently)? Or is it a power supply to the card itself? > Yeah, we should get into the details here. We were not paying attention till now, but with the advent of pwrseq, we should describe the power supply properly in DT. Here I believe the supply is to the PCIe Mini Card connector where a modem is connected. In that case, 3.3v supply should be connected to 3.3Vaux of the connector and we should have a generic pwrseq driver for the mini cards. Sibi, please verify the above in schematics. - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்