On 22/09/2024 20:00, Karan Sanghavi wrote:
> Added the vice versa order for compatible property in the yaml file so
> that the dtb can parse for the order mentioned in the dts file
> k3-am642-sk.dts for ti,j721e-usb.yaml
k3-am642-sk.dts does not introduce any nodes with the said compatibles.
"ti,am64-usb" compatible is introduced by k3-am642-main.dtsi.
There is only one compatible introduced so there is nothing to do about
order here.
i.e.
usbss0: cdns-usb@f900000 {
compatible = "ti,am64-usb";
reg = <0x00 0xf900000 0x00 0x100>;
What is the functional problem you are facing? Maybe then someone
can point you in the right direction.
>
> This is highly ambiguous to me as where exactly the changes needs to be
> added is it in the dts file or is the yaml where we have to reverse the
> order already mentioned or do we have to add the another order as I have
> done ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Karan Sanghavi <karansanghvi98@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> index 95ff9791baea..822653217c43 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/ti,j721e-usb.yaml
> @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - const: ti,j721e-usb
> - const: ti,am64-usb
> + - items:
> + - const: ti,am64-usb
> + - const: ti,j721e-usb
>
> reg:
> maxItems: 1
--
cheers,
-roger
