Hello, sorry about that, since there are no modifications at all in the patches and just sent them with the added email lists, I wasn't thinking there was a need to update the version. I will resend with an updated version number to the right lists then, even if the patches are strictly the same. Sorry about that. Thanks, JB ________________________________________ From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2024 15:39 To: INV Git Commit <INV.git-commit@xxxxxxx>; jic23@xxxxxxxxxx <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx>; robh@xxxxxxxxxx <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: lars@xxxxxxxxxx <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-iio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <Jean-Baptiste.Maneyrol@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: imu: mpu6050: Add iam20680ht/hp bindings to mpu6050 This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. On 20/09/2024 15:36, inv.git-commit@xxxxxxx wrote: > From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@xxxxxxx> > > IAM-20680HT & HP are 2 variants of IAM-20680 fully compatible. > They just have better specs, temperature range and a bigger FIFO. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@xxxxxxx> You just sent it... please do not send the same over and over again. See submitting patches. Your contributions should be versioned and provide changelog in cover letter or within patch's changelog (---). Sending the same over and over will get the same answer: nope. Best regards, Krzysztof
