On 15-03-18 03:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/18/2015 03:53 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On 15-03-18 12:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.
Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
some of the other vendors.
Conceptually I'm fine with this.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
those references need fixing up?
Yes, I read all the brcm documents and did not find references to the
moved files.
Oh, I meant references *from* the moved files to other files.
Yes, some of the moved/renamed files reference other files. But those
are to references to common dt-binding documentation files and of the
form Documentation/devicetree/bindings/xxx/yyy.txt
BTW, I just noticed that both your patches don't have signed-off-by lines.
Whoops - thanks - will have to correct. Plus, add your Acked-by.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
