Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: brcm: rationalize Broadcom documentation naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 03/18/2015 03:53 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
Hi Stephen,

On 15-03-18 12:42 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:24 PM, Scott Branden wrote:
This patchset attempts to standarize the naming of dt-bindings
documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm.

Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name
the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by
some of the other vendors.

Conceptually I'm fine with this.
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The only comment I have is that some bindings refer to other bindings,
e.g. an I2C controller binding might refer to the core I2C binding to
define core I2C properties. Since this patch moves a couple files
between directories, did you double-check that none of the pathnames in
those references need fixing up?

Yes, I read all the brcm documents and did not find references to the
moved files.

Oh, I meant references *from* the moved files to other files.

BTW, I just noticed that both your patches don't have signed-off-by lines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux