On 26.08.2024 20:31, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Use the newly introduced macros instead of raw number. With this device
> tree code is a bit easier to understand.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi | 18 +++++++++---------
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sama7g5.dtsi | 16 ++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> index 04a6d716ecaf..eeda277e684f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/sam9x60.dtsi
> @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ tcb0: timer@f8008000 {
> #size-cells = <0>;
> reg = <0xf8008000 0x100>;
> interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
> - clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 17>, <&clk32k 0>;
> + clocks = <&pmc PMC_TYPE_PERIPHERAL 17>, <&clk32k SCKC_MD_SLCK>;
Actually, looking again at it, I don't know if it worth as we use numbers
directly also for other PMC clock IDs.
Sorry for the noise,
Claudiu Beznea
