On 8/21/24 14:11, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
On 8/12/24 17:41, Depeng Shao wrote:
Add support for VFE found on SM8550 (Titan 780). This implementation is
based on the titan 480 implementation. It supports the normal and lite
VFE.
Co-developed-by: Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yongsheng Li <quic_yon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Depeng Shao <quic_depengs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
<snip>
+
+static void vfe_reg_update(struct vfe_device *vfe, enum vfe_line_id line_id)
+{
+ int port_id = line_id;
+
+ /* RUP(register update) registers has beem moved to CSID in Titan 780.
+ * Notify the event of trigger RUP.
+ */
+ camss_reg_update(vfe->camss, vfe->id, port_id, false);
+}
+
+static inline void vfe_reg_update_clear(struct vfe_device *vfe,
+ enum vfe_line_id line_id)
+{
+ int port_id = line_id;
Once I said that the comment with a typo can be removed from these two
functions, however the functions can be removed, since they are trivial,
use camss_reg_update(vfe->camss, vfe->id, port_id, ...) directly in the code.
I see that these new vfe_reg_update() and vfe_reg_update_clear() are
callback functions now, so, without making a step back, now it will not
be straightforward to get rid of one more level of indirection.
Just remove the comments then.
+
+ /* RUP(register update) registers has beem moved to CSID in Titan 780.
+ * Notify the event of trigger RUP clear.
+ */
+ camss_reg_update(vfe->camss, vfe->id, port_id, true);
+}
+
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
