Hi Prabhakar,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 2:32 PM Lad, Prabhakar
<prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 1:25 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2024 9:50 PM
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g057: Add WDT0-WDT3 nodes
> > >
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add WDT0-WDT3 nodes to RZ/V2H(P) ("R9A09G057") SoC DTSI.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v1->v2
> > > - New patch
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > index 435b1f4e7d38..7f4e8ad9b0a5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > @@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ scif: serial@11c01400 {
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + wdt0: watchdog@11c00400 {
> > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-wdt";
> > > + reg = <0 0x11c00400 0 0x400>;
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 75>,
> > > + <&cpg CPG_MOD 76>;
> > > + clock-names = "pclk", "oscclk";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 117>;
> > > + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > ostm4: timer@12c00000 {
> > > compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-ostm", "renesas,ostm";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x12c00000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > > @@ -224,6 +235,28 @@ ostm7: timer@12c03000 {
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + wdt2: watchdog@13000000 {
> > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-wdt";
> > > + reg = <0 0x13000000 0 0x400>;
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 79>,
> > > + <&cpg CPG_MOD 80>;
> > > + clock-names = "pclk", "oscclk";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 119>;
> > > + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> >
> > I guess same group(all wdt together) arranged together?? Not sure.
> >
> I think Geert prefers it to be sorted based on unit address. So I'll
> let Geert make a decision on this (and the rest of the similar patches
> where nodes are sorted based on unit address and not grouped based on
> IP).
Sorted based on unit-address, but keep all nodes of the same type together.
I.e.:
wdt0: watchdog@11c00400 { ... };
wdt2: watchdog@13000000 { ... };
wdt3: watchdog@13000400 { ... };
wdt1: watchdog@14400000 { ... };
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
