On 13/08/24 5:52 am, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:20:56 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote: >>> If the net maintainers are OK, they could potentially take the binding >>> patch along with the driver mods corresponding to this - I am a bit >>> unsure of picking up a binding if the driver implementation is heading >>> the wrong way. >> >> Hi Jakub, Paolo, David, Andrew, >> >> Will it be okay to pick this binding patch to net-next tree. Nishant is >> suggesting since the driver changes are done in drivers/net/ the binding >> can be picked by net maintainers. >> >> Please let us know if it will be okay to take this binding to net-next. >> I can post a new series with just the binding and the driver patch to >> net-next if needed. > > Nishanth, could you send an official Ack tag? > > No problem with merging it via net-next. > On the code itself you may want to use ethtool_puts(). Thanks Jakub, I will send out a new series with just the binding and driver patch and send it to net-next. I will take care of ethtool_puts(). -- Thanks and Regards, Danish
