On 17:22-20240812, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 11:20:56 +0530 MD Danish Anwar wrote: > > > If the net maintainers are OK, they could potentially take the binding > > > patch along with the driver mods corresponding to this - I am a bit > > > unsure of picking up a binding if the driver implementation is heading > > > the wrong way. > > > > Hi Jakub, Paolo, David, Andrew, > > > > Will it be okay to pick this binding patch to net-next tree. Nishant is > > suggesting since the driver changes are done in drivers/net/ the binding > > can be picked by net maintainers. > > > > Please let us know if it will be okay to take this binding to net-next. > > I can post a new series with just the binding and the driver patch to > > net-next if needed. > > Nishanth, could you send an official Ack tag? Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> Thanks Jakub. > > No problem with merging it via net-next. > On the code itself you may want to use ethtool_puts(). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
