On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 12:55 +0200, Pieter wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> Hi Arun,
>
> > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ksz8795_rcv(struct
> > sk_buff
> > > *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > > {
> > > u8 *tag = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN;
> > >
> > > - return ksz_common_rcv(skb, dev, tag[0] & 7,
> > > KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN);
> > > + return ksz_common_rcv(skb, dev, tag[0] & 3,
> > > KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN);
> > > }
> >
> > This change can be separate patch. since it is not related to
> > ksz87xx_dev_ops structure. Is it a fix or just good to have one. If
> > it
> > is a fix then it should be point to net tree.
> >
>
> It's a fix wrt to datasheet but in reality I can see from tests with
> a KSZ8794 that bit 2 is always 0 so the bug doesn't manifest itself.
>
> Please advise, keep it in net-next or make a separate patch for the
> net tree?
Then it could point to net-next. Keep it as 6th patch of this patch
set. Instead of 3 as magic number, it can be macro.
