Hi Arun,
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *ksz8795_rcv(struct sk_buff
> > *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> > u8 *tag = skb_tail_pointer(skb) - KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN;
> >
> > - return ksz_common_rcv(skb, dev, tag[0] & 7,
> > KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN);
> > + return ksz_common_rcv(skb, dev, tag[0] & 3,
> > KSZ_EGRESS_TAG_LEN);
> > }
>
> This change can be separate patch. since it is not related to
> ksz87xx_dev_ops structure. Is it a fix or just good to have one. If it
> is a fix then it should be point to net tree.
>
It's a fix wrt to datasheet but in reality I can see from tests with
a KSZ8794 that bit 2 is always 0 so the bug doesn't manifest itself.
Please advise, keep it in net-next or make a separate patch for the
net tree?
