> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2024 1:32 PM
> To: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>; Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring
> <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Fabrizio
> Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-
> lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g057: Add WDT0-WDT3 nodes
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 1:25 PM Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Prabhakar,
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2024 9:50 PM
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 6/8] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g057: Add
> > > WDT0-WDT3 nodes
> > >
> > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Add WDT0-WDT3 nodes to RZ/V2H(P) ("R9A09G057") SoC DTSI.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar
> > > <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > v1->v2
> > > - New patch
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi | 44
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > index 435b1f4e7d38..7f4e8ad9b0a5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g057.dtsi
> > > @@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ scif: serial@11c01400 {
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + wdt0: watchdog@11c00400 {
> > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-wdt";
> > > + reg = <0 0x11c00400 0 0x400>;
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 75>,
> > > + <&cpg CPG_MOD 76>;
> > > + clock-names = "pclk", "oscclk";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 117>;
> > > + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > ostm4: timer@12c00000 {
> > > compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-ostm", "renesas,ostm";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x12c00000 0x0 0x1000>; @@ -224,6
> > > +235,28 @@ ostm7: timer@12c03000 {
> > > status = "disabled";
> > > };
> > >
> > > + wdt2: watchdog@13000000 {
> > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a09g057-wdt";
> > > + reg = <0 0x13000000 0 0x400>;
> > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 79>,
> > > + <&cpg CPG_MOD 80>;
> > > + clock-names = "pclk", "oscclk";
> > > + resets = <&cpg 119>;
> > > + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> > > + status = "disabled";
> > > + };
> >
> > I guess same group(all wdt together) arranged together?? Not sure.
> >
> I think Geert prefers it to be sorted based on unit address. So I'll let Geert make a decision on this
> (and the rest of the similar patches where nodes are sorted based on unit address and not grouped
> based on IP).
I agree. If that is the case we need to fix [1]
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi?h=next-20240812#n584
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77960.dtsi?h=next-20240812#n633
Cheers,
Biju
