On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 10:49:42AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: > On Friday, 9 August 2024 10:15:12 EDT Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 08:54:52AM -0400, Detlev Casanova wrote: > > > Add reset ID defines for rk3576. > > > > > > Compared to the downstream bindings this uses continous gapless > > > reset IDs starting at 1 instead of register offsets as IDs, as > > > introduced in the RK3588 bindings. > > > Thus all numbers are different between upstream and downstream, > > > but names are kept exactly the same. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > IMO squash this with the other binding patch. > > Yes, I wanted to but the issue is with the subject line: do I use "dt- > bindings: reset+clock: [...]" in the squashed commit ? Yeah, I guess you could do "dt-bindings: clock, reset:".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
