On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 11 March 2015 14:07:11 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> >> Right now it seems that all boards in mainline with a WiLink6 part are >> using internal clocks. So as a first step I think that adding an >> optional refclock-frequency and tcxoclock-frequency properties should >> be enough. >> >> It would be good if the driver supports getting the refclock and >> tcxoclock from an external provider in case a board gets these from >> external clocks but that can be done as a followup if there are boards >> in the future using that design. >> >> But please bear in mind that I'm not familiar with the clock handling >> in WiLink6 since the WiLink8 part used in the IGEP boards does not >> need these clocks and I only looked at Luciano's previous patches and >> the WiLink today driver today. So it would be good if Eliad can double >> check my assumptions to see if those are correct. > > Sounds good. I'd also be fine with not implementing the case for > external clocks in the code until we need (and can test) it, but > I think it should be specified in the binding from the start. > Agreed. Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html