On 11 March 2015 at 17:12, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Instead of creating virtual regulators I would be strongly in favor of > reviving the voltage-domain work. That would allow us to push all those > voltage dependencies we have seen on various SoCs into the domain > handling code and don't care about it in the drivers. > > In that case cpufreq-dt wouldn't control a regulator directly, but > request a specific voltage from the domain the CPUs are located in and > those in turn would control the regulators supplying them. I agree that it would be the right approach but who is going to do that stuff ? I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach unless someone else comes up with another idea. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
