Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: microchip: add microchip,no-tag-protocol flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 02:31:42PM +0200, vtpieter@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Pieter Van Trappen <pieter.van.trappen@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Add microchip,no-tag-protocol flag to allow disabling the switch'

What is the ' for?

> tagging protocol. For cases where the CPU MAC does not support MTU
> size > 1500 such as the Zynq GEM.

What is "switch tag protocol"? Not defined anywhere? Is that VLAN 
tagging?

It seems to me that this doesn't need to be in DT. You know you have 
Zynq GEM because it should have a specific compatible. If it doesn't 
support some feature, then that should get propagated to the switch 
somehow.

Rob




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux